[00:00:07]
>>> GOOD EVENING LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES AND OTHER DEVICES AT THIS TIME.
I'M CALLING THE MEETING TO ORDER 6:30 P.M. JUNE 4TH 2026 FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF CARROLLTON.
THIS CONSISTS OF NON-MEMBERS. SEVERAL WHO ARE PRESENT.
TWO COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONER SULLIVAN AND COMMISSIONER PENDALTON BEING ABSENT. THIS COMMISSION HAS FINAL AUTHORITY ON CERTAIN ITEMS AND AN ADVISORY ROLE ON OTHERS.
IN THAT CASE THE RECOMMENDATION FOR DENIAL WILL BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL. IF THE APPLICANT MAKES A WRITTEN REQUEST IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCES.
THE COMMISSION CONDUCTS BUSINESS WITH THE AGENDA COPIES OF WHICH ARE IN THE LOBBY OUTSIDE THESE CHAMBERS.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OPEN MEETINGS ACT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS RESTRICTED FROM DISCUSSING OR TAKING ACTION ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA.
APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION PLAT OR RE-PLAT IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW IF THE PLAT MEETS ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW AND THE CITY OF CARROLLTON'S ORDINANCES.
A PLAN IS DEEMED APPROVED BY OPERATION OF LAW IF NO ACTION TO APPROVE OR DENY A PLAT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS TAKEN WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER A PLAT MEETING ALL REQUIREMENTS IS FILED. THE PUBLIC MADE COMMENT ON ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION TONIGHT.
IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE COMPLETE AN APPEARANCE LOCATED ON THE TABLE AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA UNDER THE HEADING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONSIDERED INDIVIDUALLY BEGINNING WITH THE CASE PRESENTATION AFTER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION OF STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, THE COMMISSION WILL PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE INDIVIDUAL TO SPEAK ON THE CASE. WHEN IT IS YOUR TIME TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME FORWARD TO THE PODIUM.
YOU HAVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND MAKE YOUR COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. WHEN EVERYONE IS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, THE APPLICANT WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A BRIEF CLOSING COMMENT.
AT THE TIME THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON THAT ITEM. THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTIONS OF THE CASE IS CONSIDERED TONIGHT ARE TO BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO BE HEARD BY THE COMMISSION.
IT IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE COMMISSION TO RESPOND TO PUBLIC TESTIMONY. OR ANSWER QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. AFTER THE CASE PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC TESTIMONY PERIOD IS COMPLETED, THE COMMISSION WILL CONDUCT ANY DISCUSSION AND ACTION AS APPROPRIATE.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
THANK YOU. SO THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS TO HEAR PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THE FIVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WITH COMMENTS FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS TONIGHT? I DON'T SEE ANYONE COMING FORWARD. ARE THERE ANY COMMISSIONERS WHO HAVE COMMENTS ABOUT THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OR WITHISH TO MAKE A MOTION? YES, COMMISSIONER FOSTER?>> YES, THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE VOTE TO APPROVE CON-- THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS WITH THE AS TO THE MINUTES. I THINK THERE WAS ONE SMALL MODIFICATION TO IT. AND THEN AS TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR, APPROVE AS PRESENTED AND AS TO ITEM NUMBER FIVE, ALSO FIND THAT IT'S NECESSARY AND PROPORTIONAL.
>> THE RIGHT OF WAY IS ZMES PROPORTIONAL.
THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FOSTER. YES COMMISSIONER HERMON.
>> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR I SECOND THAT MOTION.
>> THANK YOU MR. HERMON SO COMMISSIONER FOSTER MADE A MOTION SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HERMON TO APPROVE THE FIVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS TONIGHT. WITH ITEM NUMBER FOUR PROVING AS PRESENTED WITHOUT STIPULATIONS AND ITEM NUMBER FIVE FOR THE COMMISSION MUST FIND THAT A RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION IS NECESSARY IN PROPORTIONAL TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS ON THE MOTION BEFORE WE MOVE TO A VOTE? LET'S MOVE TO A VOTE. SO THE ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY WITH COMMISSIONER PENDALTON AND COMMISSIONER SULLIVAN BEING ABSENT. THANK YOU.
[PUBLIC HEARING ]
SO THE NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS IS TO THEY'RE PUBLIC HEARING[00:05:01]
AGENDA ITEM STARTING WITH AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX.THAT IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING TO AMEND, RESTATE AND REPLACE SPECIAL USE PERMIT 18SUP18 TO ALLOW TATTOO PARLOR PIERCING AND/OR PERMANENT MAKEUP SERVICE AND TO REMOVE DAY CARE CENTER AS ALLOWED USE IN AN APPROXIMATELY 152 SQUARE FOOT SPACE ZONED LR2. THAT'S LOCAL RETAIL DISTRICT AND LOCATED AT 2515 NORTH JOSEY LANE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY. THIS IS CASE NUMBER PLSUP 2026-076 PERMANENT MAKEUP. OUR CASE COORDINATOR TONIGHT IS MR. MICHAEL MCCAULEY. I DON'T HEAR THAT THE MICROPHONE'S ON. IT'S EITHER TURNED DOWN OR IT'S
NOT ON. >> MAYBE THAT'S A GOOD THING.
>> IT CAME ON RIGHT AFTER WE SAID THAT.
>> YEAH THAT'S MUCH BETTER. >> OKAY.
GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS MICHAEL MCCAULEY I'M WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. YOU MENTIONED THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN ORDER TO ALLOW PERMANENT MAKEUP SERVICE. WHICH FALLS UNDER CATEGORY TATTOO PARLOR PIERCING AND/OR PERMANENT MAKEUP.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2515 NORTH JOSEY LANE AND IT'S ABOUT A TWO-THIRD ACRE LOT. THEY DO HAVE SHARED PARKING OUT HERE AND THEY DO HAVE AMPLE PARKING FOR WHAT THEY ARE REQUESTING AS WELL. THE OVERALL SITE OR EXCUSE ME, RETAIL IN NATURE. BUT THEIR PARTICULAR SITE HERE FOR THIS ADDRESS THIS BUILDING, WHICH IS ABOUT JUST SHY OF 8500 SQUARE FEET, IT DOES HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RIGHT NOW FOR PERSONAL CARE SERVICES. AS A HAIR SALON.
THERE IS A BARBERSHOP IN THERE CURRENTLY.
THE OTHER ONES-- SPACES WILL BE LEASED OUT.
EVENTUALLY. SO THEY JUST STARTED HERE.
HERE'S THE SITE HERE TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT IS WHERE SHIPLEY'S IS LOCATED THE DONUTS.
A FEW MONTHS BACK THIS BUILDING WAS IN PRETTY ROUGH SHAPE SOME WOULD SAY. AND I KNOW OPINIONS VARY BUT IT WAS IN PRETTY POOR SHAPE AND SINCE THAT TIME, THEY HAVE DONE IMPROVEMENTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS DONE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FACILITY. AND WHAT THE APPLICANT IS WANTING TO DO WHEN IT COMES TO LEASING OUT A LITTLE SPOT, THEY WANT TO LEASE OUT ONE OF THE SPACES.
IT'S APPROXIMATELY 152 SQUARE FEET.
SO WITH THIS RECOMMENDATION FOR THE APPLICANT TO DO HERE, WHEN IT GOES FORWARD, THE ORDINANCE, IT WILL BE IDENTIFIED WITH THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT THE TATTOO PARLOR WOULD BE LIMITED TO.
SIMILAR TO THE CASE YOU GUYS HAD REVIEWED ABOUT A YEAR AGO OUT THERE ON-- MILLS SOUTH OF THE SUPER H MART SITE.
YOU MAY RECALL WHERE IT WAS APPROVED FOR A SQUARE FOOTAGE SPACE WITHIN THAT PARTICULAR SUITE.
AND THAT'S SIMILAR IN NATURE TO WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED A WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS.
YOU SHOULD HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED IT AS AN ADDENDUM IN SUPPORT OF THIS. THE PERSON WHO IS IN SUPPORT OF IT LIVES DIRECTLY BEHIND THIS PROPERTY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE EIGHT FOOT WALL. THAT SEPARATES THIS SITE.
AND THIS COMMERCIAL CENTRE WHEN THE RESIDENCE IS OUT THERE.
WE DO HAVE THE WALL IN THE BACK.
ALONG WITH AN ALLEYWAY AND THEN THE RESIDENCES.
THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE STIPULATIONS THAT ARE OUTLINED IN YOUR REPORT.
AND SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'LL TRY TO
ANSWER THEM AT THIS TIME. >> YES, COMMISSIONER DOYLE?
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MIKE, IS THE SUP SPECIFIC TO
>> SO IT COULD BE ANY 152 THE SQUARE FEET IN SITE HERE?
>> THAT IS CORRECT. THERE'S SOME LARGER ONES.
IT DOESN'T PERTAIN BECAUSE IT'S MORE THAN PRETTY MUCH DOUBLE 15
[00:10:02]
SQUARE FEET. OIN THE EVENT IT'S ALL UNDER ONE ROOF, YOU WALK INTO THE ENTRY WAY.THERE'S HALLWAYS. EACH OF THESE SPACES ARE SEPARATED BY A WALL WITH MAYBE THREE FEET IN HEIGHT.
AND THE REST IS GLASS. VERY NICE ENTRY WAY WITHIN THERE. AND IN THE EVENT THEY WANT TO GO TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THIS BUILDING.
OR THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING WE DON'T WANT TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF THEM COMING BACK HERE AGAIN JUST TO MOVE THE LOCATION. STILL KEEPING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO ANOTHER PART OF THE FLOOR PLAN.
>> DOES THIS SUP THEN LIMIT THE-- AREA TO ONE OF THESE
INSIDE THAT BUILDING? >> YES THAT'S ONE OF THE STIPULATIONS AS WELL AS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
>> OKAY, THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONER IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR M MR. MCCAULEY?
NOPE, THANK YOU. >> AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM.
>> IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM YOU CAN COME FORWARD AND DO SO AT THIS TIME.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO IF YOU DON'T WANT TO.
SO WE DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU NOW IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD ANYWAY. ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS.
IF YOU WOULD, I NEED YOU TO COME TO THE PODIUM IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD NOW.
>> MY NAME IS DANNY-- AND I AM HERE REPRESENTING MY WIFE.
TEA-- SHE'S THE ONE THAT MADE THE REQUEST.
AND ENGLISH IS HER SECOND LANGUAGE SO I'M HERE TO SORT OF. I'M DOING ALL THE PAPER WORK AS WELL. BUT YEAH SO THAT-- WHERE THE TENANT 400103 SUITE AND I'D LIKE TO MAKE COMMENT THAT THIS IS STRICTLY-- SHE'S DOING STRICTLY PERMANENT MAKEUP.
AND SO JUST FACIALS AND NO BODY PIE PIERCING IN THAT NATURE. SO JUST WANT TO KEEP IN THAT PREMISE. AND THEN OPEN FOR QUESTIONS.
>> THAT WAS MY QUESTION. >> OKAY.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT UP HERE?
>> THANK YOU. >> SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO MAKE COMMENTS WITH THEIR OPINION KNOWN FOR THIS CASE YOU MAY COME FORWARD AND DO SO AT THIS TIME. I DON'T SEE ANYONE COMING FORWARD. I DID WANT TO NOTE THERE WAS A WANDA PRUITT WHO REGISTERED IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM.
WHO WOULD NOT BE SPEAKING. SO DOES ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY FINAL QUESTIONS OR WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION CONCERNING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX?
YES, COMMISSIONER FOSTER? >> OKAY.
THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND VOTE TO APPROVE CASE NUMBER PLSUP 2026-076 WITH STAFF STIPULATIONS.
>> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FOSTER.
>> YES COMMISSIONER CRAMER. >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN.
I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. >> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER CRAMER. SO COMMISSIONER FOSTER MADE A MOTION. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CRAMER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE CASE PLSUP202-076 PERMANENT MAKEUP. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? BEFORE WE MOVE TO A VOTE? YES.
YES COMMISSIONER. FIRST VICE CHAIR DOYLE.
>> JUST REALIZE THAT DURING MY LAST CONVERSATION WITH THE APPLICANT THE MIC AND RECORDING DEVICES WERE NOT ON.
THOUGH I HAD A STRONG VOICE I WOULD LIKE TO REITERATE WE WOULD ADVICE THIS WOULD ONLY BE USED FOR PERMANENT MAKEUP AND NOT FOR PIERCINGS OR TATTOOS. THANK YOU.
>> ANY OTHER COMMENTS BEFORE WE MOVE TO A VOTE? NO? LET'S MOVE TO A VOTE.
[00:15:01]
OKAY THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.WITH COMMISSIONER PENDLETOP AND SULLIVAN BEING ABSENT.
THANK YOU, CONGRATULATIONS. IN WHICH CASE WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED ON JULY 7 2026.
OKAY THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING TO AMEND RESTATE AND REPLACE SPECIAL USE PERMIT 263 TO AMEND CONCEPTUAL PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 4.02 ACRE TRACT ZONE.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH SPECIAL USE PERMIT SUP 263 AND LOCATED AT 2040 NORTH DENTON DRIVE AND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH DENTON DRIVE AND JEANETTE WAY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY.
CASE NUMBER PLSUP 2026-064 ST. ANTHONY SPORTS FIELD.
CASE COARD NATURE MS. EMILY OFFER.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSION AND I AM HERE FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CARROLLTON APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF KELLER SPRINGS ROAD. IT'S ZONED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN EXISTING SUP FOR PRIVATE SCHOOL.
THE SUP WAS ESTABLISHED IN THE YEAR 2000 TO ALLOW THE PRIVATE SCHOOL. AND THEN LATER AMENDED IN 2013 TO ALLOW AN INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS FROM 75 TO 150. TODAY'S PROPOSED AMENDMENT DOES NOT MODIFY THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT OR THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS. 150 STUDENTS AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IS BEING PROPOSED. TODAY'S PROPOSAL INCLUDES REVISED CONCEPTUAL PLANS TO ALLOW THE ADDITION OF A TURF FIELD AND ASSOCIATED SITE MODIFICATIONS.
THE FIELD IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY TO ACCOMMODATE FOR THE FIELD. APPROXIMATELY 26,500 SQUARE FEET OF PARKING LOT PAVEMENT WOULD BE REMOVED.
LEAVING 73 PARKING SPACES. 40 SPACES ARE REQUIRED BY THE ORDINANCE. I'D LIKE TO CALL YOUR ATTENTION TO THE RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS NUMBERED SERVEN AND EIGHT OUTLINED IN YOUR REPORT. REGARDING THE REQUIREMENT OF A SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE IN THE REMOVAL OF A PROPOSED FENCE.
THE FENCE TO BE REMOVED BY STIPULATION NUMBER EIGHT WOULD BE REPLACED BY THE ENCLOSURE. RECOM RECOMMENDED-- OR I'M SORRY REQUIRED BY STIPULATION NUMBER SEVEN. RECOMMENDS THE APPROVAL SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE. TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF STUDENTS, STAFF AND MOTORISTS ALIKE.
AFTER EXTENSIVE RESEARCH OF OTHER SCHOOLS IN CARROLLTON BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC, WITH SPORTS FIELDS EITHER NEAR A DRIVING AISLE OR A STREET, STAFF INCLUDED ALL PROVIDED AN ENCLOSURE. ACTING AS A BUFFER BETWEEN THE FIELD AND THE VEHICLES. THE PROPOSED FIELD IS AS CLOSE AS TEN FEET FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY.
REQUIRING THE FIELD TO BE COMPLETELY ENCLOSED WOULD NOT ONLY DETER STUDENTS FROM ENTERING THE STREET, BUT IT WOULD ALLOW SCHOOL STAFF ADDITIONAL TIME TO PREVENT FROM ACCESSING THE STREET. THE HEIGHT REQUIRED IS LARGELY DUE TO PROTECT MOTORISTS FROM EQUIPMENT ENTERING THE STREET.
STAFF BELIEVES THIS STIPULATION IS NECESSARY DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE FIELD TO THE RIGHT OF WAY.
AS WE SHIFT GEARS TO LANDSCAPING, YOU'LL NOTICE A NOTABLE INPROVEMENT TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
CURRENTLY NO LANDSCAPING EXISTS EAST OF THE DRIVING AISLE ALONG JEANETTE WAY. OR NORTH OF THE NORTHERN DRIVING AISLE ALONG DENTON DRIVE.
THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD PROVIDE FOR ENHANCED BEAUTIFY CASE AND SCREENING ALONG BOTH CORRIDORS.
AS PART OF THE PROPOSAL THE APPLICANT DID SUBMIT A TIA OR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WHICH WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN PROPOSED FURTHER EXTENDS THE QUEUE BY DIRECTING TRAFFIC SOUTH.
AROUND THE BLUE PARKING ISLAND BEFORE TURNING NORTH AND
[00:20:02]
REACHING THE PICK-UP DROP-OFF POINT.THIS ALLOWS FOR ADDITIONAL VEHICLES TO WEIGH IN LINE ON SITE. FURTHERMORE THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES ARRIVAL AND DISMISSAL TIMES BETWEEN ELEMENTARY, MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL TO BE STAGGERED BY 45 MINUTES.
THIS WOULD THEORETICALLY DISPERSE TRAFFIC AND REDUCE NUMBER OF CARS IN THE QUEUE WHEN WE COMPARE TO RECENT VEHICULAR ACTIVITY. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
SUBJECT TO THE STIPULATIONS LISTED IN THE RESULTS SHEET.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND APPLICANT HAS STATED THEY WOULD
BE IN ATTENDANCE. >> YES COMMISSIONER OVERHOLT?
>> YES THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. I UNDERSTAND WHAT A FENCE IS PRETTY WELL. BUT WHAT WOULD BE INCLUDED UNDER THE TERM ENCLOSURE AND WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?
>> WELL, A FENCE AND A SPORTS FILLED ENCLOSURE SIMILAR THE CITY DOES CREATE SPORTS-FILLED ENCLOSURES DIFFERENTLY.
THAN QUOTE UNQUOTE, FENCES. EVEN THOUGH STRUCTURALLY THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY THE SAME. OUR ORDINANCE IS INTENDED TO REGULATE PERMITTER FENCING. DIFFERENTIATING OFFENSE FROM A SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE. ALLOWS THIS CITY FLEXIBILITY
WITHIN REASON. >> YOU WENT OVER MY HEAD I'M AFRAID. DO YOU HAVE ANY PICTURES OR DESCRIPTIONS OF WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED?
>> WE DID NOT PROVIDE ANY REQUIREMENTS OUTSIDE OF WHAT WAS LISTED IN THE STIPULATIONS. ULTIMATELY THE TYPE OF MATERIAL WOULD BE UP TO THE DISCRETION OF BUILDING INSPECTION.
HOWEVER I'M SURE YOU'VE DRIVEN BY MANY SCHOOLS THROUGHOUT CARROLLTON AND HAVE SEEN WHAT LOOKS LIKE FENCING AND MAYBE REFERRED TO AS A FENCE. BUT THE CITY DEFINES THAT REFERS TO AS A SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE.
>> SO THIS IS A CITY REQUIREMENT?
>> IT'S A DIFFERENTIATION IN DEFINITION IN ORDER TO ALLOW SOME FLEXIBILITY FOR THE ENCLOSURES AROUND SPORTS FIELDS AS OPPOSED TO A BACKYARD FOR EXAMPLE.
>> OKAY. I'LL ASK THE APPLICANT THE SAME
QUESTION. >> YES, COMMISSIONER FOSTER?
>> THANK YOU. YEAH-- HI THE SAME QUESTION OF WHAT EXACTLY IS SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE WOULD BE.
WOULD IT BE LIKE SOME SORT OF NETTING?
>> NO-- AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE DRUITT PERRY THEY HAVE A FENCE AROUND-- OR TECHNICALLY WHAT WE WOULD REFER TO AS A SPORTSFIELD ENCLOSURE AROUND THEIR FOOTBALL FIELD FOR EXAMPLE.
>> BUT IT WOULD BE LIKE A SENTENCE.
>> IT WOULD LOOK-- YES. IT WOULD BE ESSENTIALLY VERY
MUCH LIKE A FENCE. >> LIKE WOOD? IT WILL BE UP TO THE APPLICANT THOUGH.
>> BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND THE BUILDING INSPECTION WHEN
THEY APPLY FOR THEIR PERMIT. >> FOR APPROVAL.
OKAY, THANK YOU. >> YES, COMMISSIONER DOYLE.
>> THANK YOU. IS CHAIN LINK WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? CHAIN LINK FENCING?
SLASH SPORTSFIELD ENCLOSER? >> IT COULD BE A CHAIN LINK FENCE. WE'VE-- WE ALSO HAVE WROUGHT IRON AND WOOD IN OTHER PORTIONS OF THE CITY.
>> THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONERS IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO.
THANK YOU MS. OFFER. IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM YOU MAY COME FORWARD AND DO SO AT THIS TIME. IF YOU WOULD, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
>> GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS JENNIFER VUKLEDG I LIVE AT 609 OAKWOOD BOULEVARD DALLAS, TEXAS AND I REPRESENT PRECISION PREPARATORY. WE ARE A SMALL ACCREDITED PRIVATE SCHOOL THAT RECENTLY IS LOOKING TO ACQUIRE THE ST.
ANTHONY BUILDING. WE-- OUR FOCUS IS ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE AS WELL AS SOCCER DEVELOPMENT.
SO THE FIELD IS ESSENTIAL TO OUR SCHOOL ORGANIZATION.
AND SO I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ESPECIALLY
[00:25:02]
REGARDING THE SPORTS ENCLOSURE. TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY.>> YES COMMISSIONER HERMON. >> THANK YOU.
OKAY HERE WE GO. SO ALONG NORTH DENTON AND ALONG JEANETTE WAY WEST SIDE AND THE NORTH SIDE, HOW TALL WILL THE
STRUCTURE BE? >> I BELIEVE THE GUIDANCE FROM THE CITY WAS EIGHT FEET IS WHAT MY UNDERSTANDING WAS.
WE ORIGINALLY THOUGHT THERE WAS A LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
AND WE THOUGHT THAT WOULD KEEP EVERYTHING ENCLOSED.
DEPENDING ON HOW MANY-- I BELIEVE IT WAS SHRUBS, PLANTS REQUIRED BY THE SFIP BECAUSE WE WANT STUDENTS AS RUNNING TO BE ABLE TO DEACCELERATE INTO THAT BUFFER.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HAD BEEN BROUGHT UP IS ENCLOSURE AND WE ARE A LITTLE HESITANT ABOUT TEN CLOSURE ABOUT WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE. BUT IT WOULD BE WHAT IS THE STIPULATION OF THE CITY AND WHAT ARE WE REQUIRED TO PUT IN? THAT WILL ACTUALLY BE SAFE ALSO FOR STUDENTS.
IF THERE HAS TO BE PADDING OR DIFFERENT THINGS DEPENDING ON WHERE IT IS LOCATED ON THE FIELD.
>> I THOUGHT I READ SOMEWHERE WHERE IT WAS THREE FEET AND I'M LIKE THAT'S NOT GOING TO STOP A BALL FROM GOING OUT.
>> NO IT IS NOT. >> OKAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR
TIME. >> SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
I DID HAVE TWO PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS.
I'M GOING TO READ OUT THE FIRST ONE.
THE PERSON WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR OF THIS ITEM.
I COULDN'T PRONOUNCE THAT LAST NAME.
AND THE SECOND CARD THE PERSON WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION AS RAYMOND CRUMBRYE. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
PLEASE NOTE YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.
>> YES, SIR, THANK YOU COUNCIL. RAYMOND CRUMBRYNE AT 1009 JEANETTE WAY. IF YOU COULD PULL UP THE TRAFFIC PATTERN MAP. YES I AM THE DRIVEWAY DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE BLUE ARROWS RIGHT THERE.
WE ALREADY HAVE QUITE A BIT OF AN ISSUE ON JEANETTE WAY WITH CARS COMING AND PARKING ALONG THE EDGE OF THE ROAD TO PICK UP CHILDREN FROM GOODE ELEMENTARY. AND THEN WHEN TRYING TO BACK OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY AND IT'S NOT JUST MYSELF, IT'S EVERYBODY FROM MY DRIVEWAY TO THE END OF JEANETTE WAY AT ALL DENTON, WE CAN'T GET OUT AT THAT TIME OF DAY.
WE TRY TO BACK OUT, THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT'S THE SCHOOL'S FAULT. IT'S THEIR CLIENTELE UNFORTUNATELY THEY ARE RATHER RUDE AND WON'T LET US OUT OF OUR DRIVEWAYS. THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN ONE TIME I'VE HAD TO TAKE-- MORE THAN TEN MINUTES TRYING TO BACK OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY SO THAT I CAN GO GET MY DAUGHTER FROM SCHOOL OVER AT FOUNDERS ON JOSEY.
AND IT'S BECOME A PROBLEM. AND THEN LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN HERE IT LOOKS LIKE THE EXIT THAT WAS ON DENTON DRIVE IS NOW GONE. LIGHTS LIKE IT'S NOW PART OF THAT GREEN SQUARE. SO THAT MEANS THERE WILL BE NO OPTION TO GO EXIT ON DENTON DRIVE.
IT WILL ONLY BE JEANETTE WAY. WHICH IS GOING TO CAUSE MORE OF AN ISSUE IN THE SITUATION. BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE USED TO EXIT OUT ONTO DENTON. BUT NOW NOBODY WILL BE ABLE TO BY THE LOOK OF IT. I MIGHT BE WRONG.
BUT THAT'S THE WAY THE PICTURE LOOKS TO ME.
AND OTHER THAN THAT WE'RE NOT-- THEY'VE BEEN VERY GOOD NEIGHBOURS. THEY'VE HELPED US OUT QUITE A BIT DURING THE STREET REMO DEAL FEW YEARS AGO WHEN ALL THE STREETS GOT TORN UP THEY LET US PARK THERE.
THEY'VE BEEN VERY GOOD NEIGHBOURS.
BUT IT'S JUST SIMPLY, IT'S GOING TO AFFECT THE TRAFFIC PATTERN WHERE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ISSUES GETTING OUT OF OUR DRIVEWAYS. THAT WAS MY ONLY CONCERN.
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. OKAY AGAIN THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WHO WANTS TO MAKE COMMENT SO THEIR OPINION KNOWN, FOR THIS CASE, YOU MAY COME FORWARD AND DO SO AT THIS TIME. I DO NOT SEE ANYONE COMING FORWARD. THE APPLICANT HAS-- WISHES TO MAKE ANY CLOSING COMMENTS. YOU MAY COME FORWARD TO DO SO.
IF YOU HAD ANY CLOSING COMMENTS.
>> JUST IN CLOSING I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY I UNDERSTAND HIS CONCERN. I KNOW WE DID DO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS STUDY WITH WHAT I BELIEVE INDICATED THERE WOULD BE MINIMAL CHANGE. TO THE ENTERING AND EXITING.
SO I'D LIKE THAT TO BE REVIEWED PLEASE.
SO WE UNDERSTAND THE SURROUNDING AREA AND ARE COMMITTED TO BEING RESPECTFUL NEIGHBOURS AND ENSURING THAT THERE'S MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD.
WE ARE EXCITED TO BE PART OF THE CITY OF CARROLLTON AND LOOK FORWARD TO BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER IN THIS COMMUNITY.
[00:30:02]
WE RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT IN THE SUP REQUEST.>> THANK YOU. >> DOES ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY FINAL QUESTIONS? OR WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION CONCERNING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN? YES COMMISSIONER DOYLE?
FIRST VICE CHAIR DOYLE? >> THAT'S OKAY.
MA'AM, IN YOUR-- I HAVE A QUESTION.
>> NO THAT'S OKAY. >> YES, SIR.
>> YOU SAY YOU'RE ACQUIRING THIS SCHOOL.
WHICH MEANS YOU OPERATE OTHER SCH
SCHOOLS. >> WE CURRENTLY ARE AT AMERICAN INDOOR. IN AN INDOOR FACILITY FOR OUR
SOCCER TRAINING. >> OKAY THAT'S FINE.
IN YOUR TRAFFIC AND OPERATING PLAN, I SEE MANY SCHOOLS AT THE EXIT LIKE THAT POST A GUARD TO HANDLE TRAFFIC AT THAT POINT.
DO YOU HAVE ANY PLANS TO VOLUNTEER.
OR EXIT AREA. DURING THE TIME OF TRAFFIC.
>> HAVE NOT GIVEN IT A GREAT DEAL OF THOUGHT.
HOWEVER NOW I WILL. I UNDERSTAND THAT CURRENT SCHOOL. WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE IN PLACE. AND THEN HOW WE CAN SUPPORT OR ASSIST WITH THAT. FOR MINIMAL DISRUPTION.
TO MAKE THAT SUGGESTION. I DON'T THINK WE CAN WRITE THAT INTO THE STIPULATIONS. I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF YOU MADE THAT CONSIDERATION. AND LOCATIONS BUT PERHAPS YOU WILL HEAR IT. YOU JUST DON'T KNOW.
IT SOUNDED LIKE AT SOME POINT TRAFFIC ALSO EXITED ON NORTH
DENTON DRIVE. >> I WAS UNAWARE OF THAT WHEN I LOOKED AT THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. I KNOW THERE WAS--.
I KNOW THERE'S AN EXIT AND ENTRANCE POINT ON THE-- WHAT IS IT-- ON THE NORTH DENTON DRIVE. HOWEVER, DURING THE DROP-OFF, IT IS A WRAP AROUND. ALL OF THE PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF GOES IN THAT PATTERN. UNLESS IT'S AFTER SCHOOL HOURS.
FROM WHAT I INTERPRETED IT AS. BUT I COULD BE INCORRECT.
>> OKAY AND IT COULD BE FOR SAFETY REASONS HAVING IT GO ONE WAY. THANK YOU.
>> COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT BEFORE SHE GOES TO SIT DOWN?
NO. >> I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WILL BE MR. ROMBERGER OR NOT. PLAYING IN THE DRIVE-THRU.
IS THAT THE RIGHT PERSON? THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU. IT'S A QUESTION A LITTLE CONFUSION. ONLY AT CERTAIN TIMES OF THE D DAY.
MAKE A PLAN. SO THE TIA AND THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. FOR THE PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF OF THE STUDENTS. IN THE CASE THAT EVERYONE ENTERS OFF OF DENTON DRIVE AND EXITS OFF OF JEANETTE.
AND THERE IS NO SIGNING THAT IS REQUIRED IN THE TIA.
TO BLOCK THE POTENTIAL PEOPLE ENTERING AND EXITING OUTSIDE OF THE PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF PERIODS AS PART OF THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. THAT IS THE PLAN FOR EVERYONE TO EXIT ONTO JEANETTE WAY. THAT'S TO ALLOW THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF QUEUEING STORAGE. BECAUSE THE INTENT OF THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN CONTAIN AN ENTIRE LOT OF CARS THAT ARE GOING TO ACCESS THE SITE.
IN THOSE THREE 50-STUDENT BLOCKS WITH 45 MINUTE STACKING TIMES. BECAUSE WITH THE LAYOUT THEY HAVE. IT PROVIDES 475 FEET OF STA STACKING.
IS SUFFICIENT TO HOLD ALL THE TRAFFIC.
[00:35:03]
>> THANK YOU MR. ROMBERGER. COMMISSIONERS.
DOES ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY FINAL QUESTIONS OR WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION CONCERNING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
SEVEN AT THIS TIME? >> YOU HAVE TO PUSH IT ONCE.
YES COMMISSIONER OVERHOLT. >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN.
I'M STILL A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS TERM SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE. DOES THE CITY HAVE A DEFINITION
THOMAS WOOD. BUILDING INSPECTIONS.
THE TERM THAT WE ARE USING FOR THE SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE WAS TO GET IT AWAY FROM HAVING THE SAME DEFINITION AS A FENCE.
IT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE A FENCE.
IT'S GOING TO BE A FENCE. BUT WE DIDN'T WANT IT TO FALL UNDER THE FENCE ORDINANCE BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO-- IT'S CO-DEFINED AND MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN HAVING-- CALLING EIGHT SPORTS FIELD ENCLOSURE. AS EMILY SAID, ALL THE ENCLOSURES OF SCHOOLS AND SPORTS FIELDS THEY WERE CLOSE TO TRAFFIC AREAS. THEY DO HAVE AN ENCLOSURE.
I KNOW YOU'RE CONCERNED AN IS IT OR ISN'T EIGHT FENCE.
IT'S AN ENCLOSURE. YOU CAN DEFINE IT AS A FENCE.
FOR DEFINITION IT'S NOT DEFINED AS A FENCE.
ENCLOSURE. >> I HOPE YOU CAN UNDERSTAND MY CONCERN. WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S ADEQUATE TO KEEP A SOCCER BALL FROM GOING OVER THE FENCE.
I DON'T MIND A CHAIN LINK. THAT'S WHAT ALL THE CITY USES
ANYWAY. >> THAT WAS ONE OF THE MATERIALS THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED WOULD BE CHAIN LINK.
WROUGHT IRON FENCING. I DON'T THINK WE WOULD WANT WOOD THERE. ONE OF THE MATERIALS THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED. A BALL WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PASS THROUGH THE FENCE IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT.
AND THE REASON WHY WE MADE IT EIGHT FEET WAS TO TRY TO KEEP
THE BALLS FROM GOING OVER. >> IT DOESN'T SAY EIGHT FEET.
>> DOES ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY FINAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION CONCERNING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN?
>> YES COMMISSIONER FOSTER? >> UM-- YES.
I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THAT WE VOTE TO APPROVE CASE NUMBER PLSUP2026-064 WITH THE AMENDED
STAFF STIPULATIONS. >> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FOSTER. YES COMMISSIONER KRAMER.
>> THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION.
>> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER KRAMER.
SO A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER FOSTER AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER KRAMER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE CASE NUMBER PLSUP2026-064.
ST. ANTHONY SPORTS FIELD WITH THE AMENDED STIPULATIONS.
IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION BEFORE WE MOVE TO A VOTE? NO? THEN LET'S MOVE TO A VOTE. SO THE MOTION PASSES UNAN UNANIMOUSLY. AND COMMISSIONER PENDLETON BEING ABSENT. SINCE THE MOTION WAS FORWARD AND DID PASS TONIGHT THIS CASE WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 7TH 202.
[OTHER BUSINESS]
THANK YOU.COMMISSIONERS ARE THERE ANY OTHER BUSINESS ITEMS YOU'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT? BECAUSE THERE ARE NO STAFF REPORTS TONIGHT. ALL RIGHT.
[00:40:02]
WANT TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR COMING TONIGHT.ALWAYS THANKS TO THE STAFF FOR SHOWING UP.
THANK YOU FOR COUNCILMAN FLEMING FOR SHOWING UP.
I HOPE EVERYONE HAS A GOOD NIGHT AND I'M CALLING THE MEETING AT 10
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.